Michael Harrop
Active member
Reposting this to add newer links from this study/group. Original posts in 2020 and 2021.
Articles:
8 donors, delayed-release capsules. Each participant received 7 capsules from each of the 4 same-sex donors.
Participants therefore received 28 capsules, which equated to approximately 22 g (wet weight) of fecal material (approximately 14 mL of frozen microbial suspension or saline) over 2 consecutive days.
Donor and protocol info: Protocol for the Gut Bugs Trial: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of gut microbiome transfer for the treatment of obesity in adolescents https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/4/e026174
Totally inadequate donor criteria. No surprise they got no results.
No mention of stool type, only excluded antibiotic use in the past 3 months, they think they're going to cure obesity after only 2 days of FMT, etc.
I checked my emails for the listed study author contact and not only had I contacted them about FMT donor quality in 2019, and then again in early 2020, but a handful of the authors were also authors on the "super-donors" paper:
Articles:
- https://www.medpagetoday.com/pediatrics/obesity/90350
- https://www.lenscience.auckland.ac.nz/en/about/teaching-and-learning-resources/gut-bugs-exploring-the-human-microbiome/understanding-the-gut-bugs-trial-case-study.html
8 donors, delayed-release capsules. Each participant received 7 capsules from each of the 4 same-sex donors.
Participants therefore received 28 capsules, which equated to approximately 22 g (wet weight) of fecal material (approximately 14 mL of frozen microbial suspension or saline) over 2 consecutive days.
Donor and protocol info: Protocol for the Gut Bugs Trial: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of gut microbiome transfer for the treatment of obesity in adolescents https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/4/e026174
Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for donors in the Gut Bugs Trial https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/4/e026174#T1Healthy lean donors (males and females, aged 18–28 years) will provide fresh stool samples from which bacteria will be isolated and double encapsulated.
Eligible donors will be identified by word of mouth, the internal email system at the University of Auckland and social media networks.
To eliminate the risks of transmission of infectious diseases, we will use screening procedures equivalent to those used for blood donation in New Zealand
Totally inadequate donor criteria. No surprise they got no results.
No mention of stool type, only excluded antibiotic use in the past 3 months, they think they're going to cure obesity after only 2 days of FMT, etc.
I checked my emails for the listed study author contact and not only had I contacted them about FMT donor quality in 2019, and then again in early 2020, but a handful of the authors were also authors on the "super-donors" paper:
Fucking incredible. Even people who authored a major review arguing how critical donor quality is, did next to nothing different from the hundreds of other FMT studies that failed with inadequate donors & criteria, completely ignored vital donor quality criteria/metrics, and ignored advice & information on donor quality. This continued mind-boggling level of incompetence is insane.The Super-Donor Phenomenon in Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (Jan 2019) https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00002/full
- Format correct?
- Yes
Last edited: