Discussion of Jane Dudley's website as a source of reputable information on the microbiome and FMT

I checked some of the links on that page, and I would say that should not be "go-to" information to give to people, especially not by itself without any disclaimer. It's missing some very important information & warnings, and is overall going to give people a very poor understanding of the topics it covers. It cites some very poor sources.

In my opinion, the wiki is by far the best resource available.
 
I understand you find it difficult to expend a lot of energy, but without establishing even one example of your claims, I really have nothing to go on. Jane obviously plans to turn turn that website into a fully featured information hub, so I'm sure she'd appreciate the constructive feedback, and if you posted it here I'd but interested too.
 
If one reviews the link I shared, it should be quite obvious. Compare the Where to get FMT page with her "FMT Clinics" document. A specific example is her heavy reliance on hearsay, which is heavily contradicted by the public evidence.

I see she cites my wiki and capsule-making video in one of her documents, which is appreciated, but those documents don't seem up-to-date.

Compare her "Making FMT" document to the info & instructions in the wiki. I think her method is poor and possibly detrimental (blending, air exposure).

Additionally, she has shown herself to be a very unreliable source and easily manipulated by people with bad intentions.


Jane Dudley is not a reputable source of information. She started blatantly lying, which calls into question all the hearsay she's spread in the past, which she was taken at her word for.

At best, she's a childish, gullible, easily manipulated, irresponsible person, lacking integrity and intelligence, who spreads hearsay, lies, and disinformation based on what she wants to believe is true, which she picks up from scammers and trolls. Does no fact checking, nor bothers to review available evidence before making extremely important decisions/conclusions.

FYI, I have not talked about this/her since that last instance, and I only commented on this since you're citing her as a valid source and asked me to expound. This was a dormant issue, and I was happy to keep it that way.
 
Back
Top