Posting more laughable, misleading, and dishonest nonsense that cherry-picks certain things while ignoring others won't cause me to share details.
This last paragraph contains flat-out lies. Not too sure what to do about that. Open discourse is important, but someone purposely posting lies and...
If there is an honest misunderstanding, I recommend carefully re-reading the previous comments. There's no need to fill this thread with an off-topic discussion that already contains a lot of erroneous, useless noise. Readers can decide for themselves. Isthmus's summary is close.
RFK Jr. adviser Calley Means resigns amid growing MAHA discontent over lack of progress
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/rfk-jr-adviser-calley-means-resigns-amid-growing-maha-discontent-over-lack-of-progress...
I don't know much about these, but this review lists some other possibilities besides NAC:
From biofilm tolerance to antimicrobial resistance: molecular adaptation strategies and emerging therapeutic vulnerabilities in resistant pathogens (Review, Oct 2026)
https://bioengineer.org/biofilm-tolerance-emerges-as-key-driver-of-antibiotic-treatment-failure/
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1988464/full
A review that lists possible strategies for tackling biofilms.
If you review the link I shared, you will see that those notions are outdated and are being debunked by newer microbiome research.
There is a 0% chance this is purely genetic and uninfluenced by the gut microbiome.
This is laughable; just like your previous post, where you fabricated an absurd hypothetical in which I "stole" public information from a crook in order to boost the results of my donors. I have no obligation to respond to such pathetic absurdities.