This video was a good reminder of another possible reason Congresspeople have done nothing about this -- personal investments in the stock market (the pharmaceutical industry).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsrAZ0gnkPo
It sounds like you didn't read the stickied post: https://forum.humanmicrobiome.info/threads/before-you-post-or-comment-here-please-review-the-testing-page-of-the.24/
Related thread:
FMT, donor-matching, screening for specific microbes, and pre-treatment/eradication. "Killing things off" vs suppression & ecosystem restoration.
https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-025-04353-y
I think n=106, but they're using the word "pairs" confusingly. I don't think they gave the 24 healthy controls FMT.
Donors:
Doesn't say how many donors were used.
Results:
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1632210/full
Another piece of evidence opposing antibiotics prior to FMT.
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-08-obese-teens-healthy-gut-bacteria.html
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-62752-4
New Zealand group. This is a follow-up to their "gut bugs" study...
By "can't", do you mean "shouldn't be"? There's info in this thread: https://forum.humanmicrobiome.info/threads/microbiota-therapeutics-program-mtp-at-the-university-of-minnesota-jun.1089/ - you can continue there since it's off-topic here.
I think this is a continued misunderstanding of the situation. There is already heavy regulation that the UMN stool bank complies with. The issue is that the person running the stool bank lacks the judgment and motivation to acquire safe and effective donors.
As I said, because they know about it and claim they want to make cures available and end chronic disease. The public doesn't need to be well-informed for the FDA, NIH, or HHS to do something about a relatively unknown treatment. There is nothing else that comes close to the power & potential of...
I'm always skeptical of adverse event tracking, but it doesn't appear they used former cancer patients as donors for this study. It appears that they used regular, healthy donors.
In fact, this study provides support for the notion that you don't need to use other cancer patients as donors.