Michael Harrop
Well-known member
- Format correct?
- Yes
What is he wrong about??You're welcome to present your evidence and arguments here: https://forum.humanmicrobiome.info/threads/is-sibo-real-sibo-vs-dysbiosis-debunking-the-sibo-hypothesis-small-int.690
I wouldn't bother following someone who's been so wrong for so long.
As much as i agree that sibo is basically dysbiosis its still overgrowth… Do you follow Mark’s Pimentel research? Network of normal duodenal bacteria is completely destroyed and therefore other bacteria prolifirate.
That is covered in the first post in this thread.
Of course. https://humanmicrobiome.info/obesity/
If you review the OP, you can see that there is no way to have or determine dysbiosis solely in the small intestine and not the large intestine.Rather than being too much bacteria in the small intestine, there is simply dysbiosis in the small intestine.
This is nonsense, not backed by any science that I'm aware of.This original explanation was that “too much” bacteria in the small intestine was eating the food our small intestine was suppose to be absorbing.
Thank you so much! Didn’t know that about the bile acid connection with fat processing.Of course. https://humanmicrobiome.info/obesity/
If you review the OP, you can see that there is no way to have or determine dysbiosis solely in the small intestine and not the large intestine.
This is nonsense, not backed by any science that I'm aware of.
Bile acid metabolism is a more likely major player: https://humanmicrobiome.info/bile/
Definitely.Also, do you think information in the small intestine from dysbiosis can also inhibit its ability to absorb properly? Maybe a contributing factor?