Microbiota transplantation reduces recurrence of brain disorder in patients with advanced liver disease (Jan 2025, n=60) Microbiota transplant for hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis: The THEMATIC trial FMT 

Fecal Microbiota Transplants

Michael Harrop

Active member
Joined
Jul 6, 2023
Messages
961
Location
USA

Highlights​

• Patients with cirrhosis and prior overt HE already on lactulose and rifaximin need further therapies to prevent recurrence.
• Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) phase 1 studies are safe but larger studies are needed
• In a phase 2 trial of cirrhosis with HE on therapy, oral and rectal routes from 0 to 3 doses were tested.
• FMT was safe without any related hospitalizations or serious adverse events.
• As a secondary outcome, FMT was associated with reduced HE recurrence regardless of dose or route, which was lower in those with greater donor microbial engraftment.

Abstract​

Background​

Preventing hepatic encephalopathy (HE) recurrence in cirrhosis, which is associated with an altered gut-liver-brain axis, is an unmet need. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is beneficial in phase-1 studies, but route and dose-related questions remain.

Methods​

We performed a phase-2 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, clinical trial of capsule and enema FMT in cirrhosis and HE on lactulose and rifaximin. Subjects were randomized into 4 groups receiving 3 active and 0-placebo, 2 active and 1-placebo, 1 active and 2-placebo, or all 3-placebo doses. Each patient received two capsule and one enema FMT and were followed for six months. Primary outcome: FMT-related serious adverse events/AEs using intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes were HE recurrence, all-cause hospitalizations, death, donor engraftment, and quality-of-life (QOL). FMT was from a vegan or omnivorous donor.

Results​

60 patients (15/group) with similar baseline characteristics were enrolled. Primary outcomes: FMT was safe without any FMT-related SAEs/ AEs. Secondary outcomes: Overall SAEs (p=0.96) or death (p=1.0) were similar. There were significant differences in HE recurrence between groups (p=0.035, Cramer’s V=0.39). Post-hoc, recurrence was highest in all-placebo vs FMT [40% vs 9%, OR:0.15 (95% CI: 0.04, 0.64)]. Within FMT, HE-recurrence rates were similar regardless of route, doses, or donor type. QOL improved in FMT-recipient groups. Engraftment was highest in those with high pre-FMT Lachnospiraceae and lower in those whose HE recurred.

Conclusions​

In a Phase 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial in cirrhosis with HE on maximal therapy, FMT regardless of dose, route, or donor was safe without any FMT-related adverse events. On post-hoc analysis, groups differed on HE recurrence, which was highest in the placebo-only group and linked with lower baseline Lachnospiraceae and reduced donor engraftment.

Graphical abstract​

The FMT products were manufactured from the stool of two healthy donors in a Good Manufacturing Practice facility by the University of Minnesota Microbiota Therapeutics Program (supplement) [10, 11]. Individual recipients received all FMT products from the same donor.
Their donors are awful, but researchers keep using them because of the FDA and because it's the most familiar & comfortable thing for them to do. More evidence that researchers don't care about patients or outcomes.

The lead researcher for this study, Jasmohan S. Bajaj, MD, is well aware of me, my work, and the donor quality issue.
 
Format correct?
  1. Yes
Back
Top