Michael Harrop
Well-known member
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17562848251321121
There are many caveats to this study. A main one is that BMI includes muscle mass, so it's not a good measurement of obesity or being overweight. Body fat is a better measurement.
I know of someone who did FMT from a donor who was highly effective for C. diff, yet failed my screening criteria. He is very very fit. The person who did FMT from him trended towards obesity (and other detrimental side effects) afterward. FMT is complex.
Abstract
Background:
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a successful therapy for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). FMT from overweight donors is speculated to influence the recipient’s body mass index (BMI) after administration for CDI.
Objectives:
We investigated changes in the recipient’s BMI after FMT in relation to the donor’s BMI.
Design:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving patients who underwent FMT for recurrent CDI at Mayo Clinic between 2012 and 2019.
Methods:
We analyzed demographic and donor data for patients undergoing FMT at Mayo Clinic (2012–2019). Recipient BMI (pre- and post-FMT) and donor BMI were extracted from medical records. Mixed-effects linear regression was used to evaluate the impact of donor BMI, donor BMI category, recipient baseline BMI, time before and after FMT, and interactions between these variables on overall BMI change and BMI change per month. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to assess BMI changes (⩾5 units) based on the last recorded post-FMT BMI.
Results:
We analyzed data from 401 patients with recorded BMI measurements before and after FMT. The median age of the recipients at the time of FMT was 59.1 years (interquartile range (IQR): 40.5–70.1 years), with 61.6% being female. The median BMI for recipients prior to FMT was 26.7 kg/m² (IQR: 22.7–31.6 kg/m²), while the median BMI of the donors was 24.5 kg/m2 (IQR: 23.9–27.5 kg/m2). Stool from donors with a normal BMI was used for 58.2% of recipients, while 41.8% received stool from pre-obese donors. Donor BMI data were missing for 3.2% of recipients. Donor BMI was not significantly associated with changes in recipient BMI; for each 1-unit increase in donor BMI, a 0.01-unit monthly increase was observed (95% confidence interval: −0.0003, 0.02; p = 0.11). The log-rank test for BMI increases (⩾+5) and decreases (⩽−5) revealed no significant differences among the donor BMI groups (Chi-squared = 4.4, p = 0.1 for increases, Chi-squared = 2, p = 0.4 for decreases).
Conclusion:
The lack of impact of donor BMI on BMI changes post-FMT suggests that these changes are more dependent on the recipient’s metabolic profile. Prospective, controlled trials are required to analyze these results more comprehensively.
These findings suggest that post-FMT BMI changes are more dependent on the recipient’s own health and recovery from CDI than on the BMI of the stool donor. This highlights the need for further research, particularly through long-term and controlled studies, to confirm these results and refine donor selection guidelines.
There are many caveats to this study. A main one is that BMI includes muscle mass, so it's not a good measurement of obesity or being overweight. Body fat is a better measurement.
I know of someone who did FMT from a donor who was highly effective for C. diff, yet failed my screening criteria. He is very very fit. The person who did FMT from him trended towards obesity (and other detrimental side effects) afterward. FMT is complex.
- Format correct?
- Yes
Last edited: